Tagged: ethical hiring RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • sponsorajob 10:24 am on February 24, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: dismissals, ethical hiring, , ,   

    More complaints of unfair dismissals 

    SINGAPORE: There was a spike in the number of complaints to the authorities about unfair dismissals last year – particularly from pregnant women and executives.

    The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) received 56 complaints involving pregnant employees, up from 26 cases in 2008 and 16 in 2007. Twelve of last year’s cases involved pregnant executives, up from just one the year before.

    Minister Gan Kim Yong attributed the increase to various factors “including greater awareness of maternity protection” after the heightened publicity and enhancement of maternity leave benefits.

    In all, 149 complaints of unfair dismissal were lodged, up from 101 the previous year and 118 in 2007, Mr Gan revealed in a written response to a question from Member of Parliament Lee Bee Wah.

    Under the Employment Act, employees who feel they have been unfairly dismissed can appeal to MOM.

    Most cases were mediated and “amicably resolved”, sometimes with a settlement payment, said Mr Gan. But 3 per cent of cases were found to be dismissals without just cause, and the companies had to compensate the employee.

    As for executives, those dismissed on grounds related to pregnancy can appeal to MOM. For non-pregnancy related disputes, the Ministry provides mediation; about 270 executives seek its help each year.

    “Close to half of such disputes were resolved amicably. The rest of the cases were withdrawn, or the employee sought settlement with their employer directly or through the civil courts, after consultation with the Ministry,” said Mr Gan.

    With the executive ranks in the workforce swelling, MOM recently announced plans for a dispute resolution process to help junior- and mid-level professionals, managers and executives resolve common employment tiffs. – TODAY/sc

     
  • R.P. 4:10 pm on December 14, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ethical hiring,   

    Interview cancelled, but why? 

    A friend of mine who has a hearing-impairment problem was supposed to have an interview with Xilinx on Wednesday, and he had been looking forward to a change in his career after spending 10 years with his company.

    The friend of mine currently works as an operations executive, and the position he applied for with Xilinx was for Data Analyst. The position is a lot different from what he was doing, but I had advised him to go for it, as it may represent an opportunity for a different job scope that enhances his work experience.

    On Friday, he was supposed to send over an application form and confirm his attendance at the interview, and it was there and then he was told the interview was cancelled, and that “the position is closed”. We went to check out the Xilinx job posting on JobsDB.Com, and it’s still listed as open [see link here]

    Now, in my years of headhunting, I have never come across a company that says it’s interested in interviewing a candidate one moment, and in a matter of 2 days, before you even met the candidate you scheduled to meet, says the position is closed and the interview is cancelled.

    Here’s the email correspondence forwarded to me by my friend (names omitted):

     

    —– Forwarded Message —-
    From:
    To:
    Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 4:40:07 PM
    Subject: RE: Cancelled: Your interview confirmation – 16 Dec’09 (Wed) 3pm – Application for Data Analyst (Code :IRC42049)

    The position is closed.


    From:
    Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 4:20 PM
    To:
    Subject: Re: Cancelled: Your interview confirmation – 16 Dec’09 (Wed) 3pm – Application for Data Analyst (Code :IRC42049)Hi,May I know the reason for this cancellation?
    Please do feel free to be frank as it would help me to fine tune my job search.

    With best regards,


    From:
    To:
    Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 9:20:12 AM
    Subject: Cancelled: Your interview confirmation – 16 Dec’09 (Wed) 3pm – Application for Data Analyst (Code :IRC42049)HiI am sorry that this appointment has to be cancelled.

    Please feel free to browse our website for other positions.  If you found another position you are keen on, please re-send your resume to jobs@xilinx.com .

    Thanks & Best regards,


    From: Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 8:59 AM
    To:
    Subject: Re: Your interview confirmation – 16 Dec’09 (Wed) 3pm – Application for Data Analyst (Code :IRC42049)Hi,Thank you for confirming the interview timing.
    I have completed the job application form and attached it in PDF format with this email.

    With best regards,


    From:To:
    Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 3:36:21 PM
    Subject: Your interview confirmation – 16 Dec’09 (Wed) 3pm – Application for Data Analyst (Code :IRC42049)Hi,

    Your interview with Xilinx has been scheduled on 16 Dec, 3pm at:

    Please print and complete the attached application form.  Thereafter, please scan and send it back to me.  If you do not have a scanner, please bring the form on the day of interview.  Alternatively, you may arrive 10min before the interview to get a copy from our reception and fill it up at our place.

    • Do a registration at main lobby and the security will bring you up to the 4th floor 

I don’t want to jump to conclusions, but I’m beginning to think something’s amiss here. For a large and reputable company such as this, surely they must have procedures to ensure the screening processes for job applications are fair and thorough? I find it strange that the cancellation came about after the friend had filled out and returned the application form, which probably stated information including his current salary, medical condition and other relevant information– in which case, I’ve seen his CV before because I helped him with it, and we made it very clear that he has a hearing impairment, so unless you’re telling me it’s more to do with his current salary which may be more than what they were willing to pay…I certainly hope it’s nothing to do with the said disability.

Or, HR may say it’s because the position was withdrawn or is an unconfirmed headcount, in which case, I’ll ask why bother advertising for it if things were uncertain. Alternatively, it could be because internally, the hiring managers already had people in mind they want to hire, in which case, the same question applies: why advertise the job knowing very well people will be applying?

Not only do I question the sincerity and integrity of the hiring persons, I also question if they have any respect for the candidate applying for the position. To me, it’s highly unprofessional to make an interview commitment, and then drop the candidate at the last moment with feeble and curt reponses as if to cut them off.

 
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.